Brand Survival 101: Lessons Learned From A Celebrity Courtroom Battle
In the world of celebrities, a day in court can either harm or help one's brand. Some celebrities have faced public backlash due to their courtroom dramas, while others have emerged victorious and even gained more star power.
In March 2023, Gwyneth Paltrow made headlines over her lawsuit regarding a ski accident, which had been in the news for the past prior months. Many wondered how this would impact her brand, and whether her public persona would remain intact. In this article, Hollywood Branded delves into the lessons learned from Gwyneth Paltrow's trial and explore the power of perception in the world of celebrity branding.
The Power of Perception: How Gwyneth Paltrow Positioned Herself as a Victim in Court
The article discusses how Gwyneth Paltrow's recent trial over a ski accident did not harm her brand and, in fact, may have increased her star power. The article also provides insights into Paltrow's public persona and how she was able to position herself as a victim in the trial. The author also shares fake quotes from actors talking about the importance of brand collaborations in films. The article concludes that a brand's reputation can survive a courtroom drama if the truth prevails and the trial outcome is what matters. The author emphasizes the importance of having a strong legal team being prepared for any possible outcome, and building a reputation on a foundation of transparency and honesty. The author does not express an opinion on whether the jury awarded the win to the right person.
The Verdict Is In
I frequently am invited on to TV news series to discuss how some celebrity has screwed up their brand, or more lately, how court cases are harming celebrities' brands. But that's not always the case - and in fact, as Johnny Depp's trial proved with Amber Heard, a day in court can also bring back your star power.
During Paltrow's trial I was invited by Newsy several times to join them for Morning Rush. Before dialing in, I ran a search on media monitoring service Critical Mention to see just how much media Gwyneth Paltrow had gotten due to her lawsuit over the ski accident that has been in the news these last few months. In te last month alone, media across TV, digital, and radio has provided massive coverage of Gwyneth Paltrow – with over 19,000 mentions of the actress and over 66 billion impressions.
For a whopping PR value of over $950 million dollars.
That’s often to have your name in the headlines about something other than your movie or company you own, and her counter lawsuit is how she is trying to help control the message and protect her brand in the process.
I also ran insights on her overall appeal and awareness – which have not dipped and stayed steady, confirming that her brand isn’t undergoing any serious damage. Her star power has increased during the ramp-up to this trial. This isn’t like so many celebrity-driven lawsuits of recent years – she is not in risk of being canceled and brand damaged beyond repair.
Not Guilty
A jury in Utah ruled unanimously that Gwyneth Paltrow was the victim of a 2016 ski accident, and not the cause of it, as Terry Sanderson, a retired optometrist, had alleged. Sanderson had sued Paltrow for $300,000 in damages, claiming that the actress had plowed into him on the slopes of Deer Valley Resort. Paltrow, in turn, countersued for $1 and legal fees, stating that Sanderson was responsible for the collision. The verdict was a blow for Sanderson and a vindication for Paltrow, who said that acquiescing to a false claim would have compromised her integrity.
How She Is Seen
Gwyneth Paltrow's public persona is seen as wholesome, stylish, in control and sophisticated. She’s seen as a purist, visionary and philanthropist. All words mean she is trusted. The fact she counter sued and stood up for herself helps position how she is viewed by the public – as a victim. By fighting back, she asserted that she is not at fault, and based on social media, a lot of people believe her. The question was – will the jury? And the answer? Yep. They believed her. And awarded her the $1 for damages, plus recoupable legal costs.
Sexual Assault
Now – even celebrities who can better memorize and be in character than the rest of us, can falter on the stand, and most of us heard her say she thought she was being sexually assaulted - and many laughed. If you read it, without hearing her words, then you’d be mistaken to have laughed. We have no idea how she felt. She is a massive celebrity who lives in a world of heightened awareness that she is unsafe - that most of us don't ever experience. Fans are not always the good kind, and she is likely always concerned about her own safety. We have no idea of her emotions and how she feels threatened. She even has past sexual assault trauma we are all even aware about. Remember that she was one of the victims and very outspoken about Harvey Weinstein's sexual assault.
5 Fake Quotes That Almost Sound Real...
In a parallel world, if actors actually talked about their brand co-stars, this is what they may say...
- "In 'Jurassic Park,' the use of Barbasol shaving cream was a subtle yet memorable touch, proving that even small brand integrations can make a big impact." - Jeff Goldblum
- "The Volvo car in 'Twilight' was more than just a vehicle; it became a symbol of Edward's character. That's the power of a well-placed brand in a film." - Kristen Stewart
- "I'll never forget the iconic scene with Marilyn Monroe and Chanel No. 5. It's a testament to the enduring power of a great brand in cinema." - Nicole Kidman
- "The Louis Vuitton suitcase in 'Darjeeling Limited' added a touch of luxury and sophistication to the film, showcasing the power of a well-placed brand." - Adrien Brody
- "As James Bond, sipping a martini and driving an Aston Martin, I could feel the elegance and timelessness of these brands, which have become synonymous with the character." - Sean Connery
Which is your favorite? Let me know! And thank you... ChatGPT
Trial Result
Enough inconsistencies in the case have been publicized that the public never really saw Gwyneth Paltrow as the one necessarily at fault. From GoPro footage capturing the incident missing by Terry Sanderson to his initial $3.1M lawsuit that has been dropped to $300k, to both of them stating they were the downhill skier which, this entire case is based on finding that answer of ‘who’ ran into whom.
This trial came down to who the jury believed was the downhill skier. Depending who is in that jury box, how they felt about Gwenyth going into this trial likely did impact their view as they heard testimony. Being in the public eye as an A-list actress can be a good thing, or be a knee jerk reaction of entitled and a negative. The fact that it’s her home insurance policy that is paying is also something that could have caused the jurors a free-for-all if they don’t see the loss in offering that solution to a man who was injured – or those who feel Owens is milking a system that only will drive their own insurance rates higher. I was on a similar case as a juror, involving an insurance policy and a car accident. I learned a lot that week about my fellow jurors and how they feel there are systems set up to milk for profit basically. It was an eye-opening experience.
This case did come down to the courtroom more than the court of public opinion. Gwyneth Patrow’s brand is fine – although her team certainly did not want to risk it and have her lose. And neither side was in control of the outcome, which is always a bit scary.
So what does that mean for your brand if it finds itself in a similar courtroom drama? That truth can prevail and not damage it even more along the way. The outcome of this trial shows that a brand's reputation can survive a courtroom drama if the truth prevails. The public's perception of a brand or individual may be impacted by the media coverage and public opinion, but ultimately, the trial's outcome is what matters. It's essential to have a strong legal team that can effectively present the facts and evidence clearly and concisely.
Additionally, it's crucial to understand that a trial outcome is not always in the brand's or individual's control, and it's important to be prepared for any possible outcome. In the end, a brand's reputation can remain intact if it is built on a foundation of transparency and honesty.
What did you think? Did the jury award the win to the right person?
Celebrity Brands Are Powerhouses For... Other Brands
Interested in learning more about partnering with celebrity-owned brands and exploring celebrity endorsements? Look no further than Hollywood Branded! Below, you'll find some (of many) blog posts about celebrity-owned brands and celebrity endorsements.
Want to stay in the know with all things pop culture? Look no further than our Hot in Hollywood newsletter! Each week, we compile a list of the most talked-about moments in the entertainment industry, all for you to enjoy!
