What Brands Get Wrong About Olympic Athlete Partnerships in 2028

 

Table Of Contents

 
”Listen to audio version”
14:04

Why the Olympic Playbook Is Nothing Like a Standard Endorsement Deal

Working with Olympic athletes is one of the most powerful brand-building opportunities available to marketers. The credibility is real. The emotional resonance is real. And with the 2028 Games coming to Los Angeles, the cultural moment is enormous. But the playbook is completely different from what most marketers are used to, and the brands that approach Olympic partnerships the same way they approach standard influencer or celebrity deals are the ones that consistently waste their money and miss the moment entirely. The rules are different. The timelines are compressed. The regulatory landscape is complex. And the value lives in places most brand teams are not trained to look.

Hollywood Branded has been brokering Olympic athlete partnerships for over a decade, including a partnership between Club Med and four-time U.S. Olympic triathlete Hunter Kemper for the grand opening of Club Med Sandpiper Bay in Port St. Lucie, Florida. Kemper was one of the most decorated American triathletes in history, a seven-time national champion, the first U.S. male triathlete ranked number one in the world, and a four-time Wheaties box athlete. That partnership worked because the alignment was completely real, and every Olympic deal since has reinforced the same lesson: getting this right requires a fundamentally different approach than any other kind of celebrity marketing. In this article, Hollywood Branded discusses what brands consistently get wrong about Olympic athlete partnerships and exactly how to get them right before LA 2028.

Olympics 03 - Premium Is a Feeling


Most Olympic Athletes Don't Cross Over. Plan for That.

This is the thing no one in marketing wants to say out loud, but it is essential to understand before signing any Olympic athlete deal. The vast majority of Olympic athletes, even gold medalists, do not become mainstream celebrities. They have a window of intense public attention that lasts a few weeks to a few months, and then the culture moves on. The athletes who do cross over into lasting brand relevance share very specific traits. Chloe Kim has deals with Nike, Toyota, Samsung, Visa, and Monster because she combines elite performance with a personality that translates completely off the mountain. Simone Biles transcended gymnastics by being willing to talk about mental health on the world's biggest stage. Ilona Maher went from rugby player to cultural phenomenon by treating social media like a second discipline, investing real hours every week in content that had nothing to do with her sport. Eileen Gu pulled in $23 million in a single year. Michael Phelps translated 28 medals into long-term deals spanning a full decade. These athletes have outward personalities that translate on camera and on social, crossover appeal that extends beyond their sport into fashion, entertainment, or youth culture, and a commitment to content creation that matches their commitment to training.

Most Olympians do not have that combination, and that is not a knock on those athletes. It is simply how Olympic fame works. A gold medalist in skeleton or biathlon or even figure skating may have an incredible story and real credibility, but their social following might be modest and their audience limited to fans of that specific sport. That changes what you are actually buying when you sign an Olympic partnership. You are not buying reach in the influencer sense. You are buying credibility, narrative, and association. The value of an Olympic partnership lives in the story you tell together, not in the athlete's follower count. The brands that understand this build campaigns around the journey. The brands that do not end up disappointed by metrics that were never going to match their standard influencer benchmarks, because they were never the right benchmarks to begin with.

Olympic athlete receiving a gold medal on the podium in front of a packed international crowd, representing the compressed window of peak public visibility that most Olympians experience and that brands must plan their partnerships around.Photo Credit: The Science Survey


Blackout Periods, Rule 40, and the Timeline Trap That Burns Brands

This is where brands get burned most often, and it is rarely discussed openly in the marketing press. The IOC's Rule 40 governs what athletes can and cannot do commercially during the Olympic period, which typically runs from a few days before the Opening Ceremony through the Closing Ceremony. While the IOC has loosened these restrictions in recent years, they have not eliminated them. There are still windows where your athlete cannot promote your brand, cannot post on your behalf, and cannot appear in your campaign content.

The USOPC and individual sport federations add additional layers on top of that. Some require advance notification of marketing plans. Some restrict use of Olympic terminology, imagery, and the five-ring symbol entirely. Non-Olympic sponsors can run what is called Generic Advertising featuring an athlete's likeness, but it cannot reference the Games, Team USA, or any Olympic intellectual property. Athlete Recognition Marketing, such as a congratulatory post, is limited to social media only, one athlete per piece, and cannot be supported by paid media amplification.

The detail that most brand teams do not fully absorb until it is too late is that the penalties for violations land on the athlete, not the brand. Getting this wrong does not just kill your campaign. It damages the athlete relationship and potentially the athlete's standing with the USOPC and their federation. If the activation calendar is not built around these restrictions from the very beginning of the planning process, a brand can find itself with a signed athlete and no ability to use them during the exact moment their visibility peaks. For LA 2028, athlete contracts take months to negotiate, creative campaigns take months to develop, and activation logistics in a city as complex as Los Angeles take months to plan. This is not a space where you figure it out as you go. The brands that win in this environment are the ones that map the regulatory landscape before they sign anything, not after.

Olympic partnership contract document alongside a planning calendar with marked blackout periods, representing the complex regulatory timeline that brands must build their activation strategy around before signing any Olympic athlete deal.Photo Credit: Vecteezy 


Their Audience Is Not an Influencer's Audience

An Olympic athlete's fanbase is fundamentally different from a lifestyle influencer's, and conflating the two is one of the most common and costly mistakes brand teams make when entering this space. Olympic athlete followers skew toward sports enthusiasts, patriotic viewers who tune in every four years, families, and young athletes who aspire to compete. The engagement patterns are different. The content expectations are different. The purchasing behavior is different. If a brand's target audience overlaps meaningfully with that demographic profile, an Olympic partnership can be enormously effective. If the goal is to reach Gen Z beauty consumers or millennial tech buyers, an Olympic partnership might not move the needle the way the brand expects, unless the team is working with one of the rare athletes who has built an audience that genuinely extends beyond their sport.

NBC averaged 32 million viewers per day during the Paris 2024 Games across digital and linear, and there were 412 billion engagements with Olympic content on social media. Those are extraordinary numbers. But they represent a specific kind of audience engagement that is emotionally charged, nationally oriented, and compressed into a two-week window. Brands need to do the audience analysis before signing the deal, not after. Look at engagement patterns, follower demographics, and what content actually resonates on the athlete's channels. Understand whether the athlete's natural audience overlaps with the brand's actual target consumer. A gold medal is impressive. It is not a media plan. The brands that treat it like one are the ones that report disappointing results after the Games and quietly move on without understanding exactly why the investment did not deliver what they expected

New call-to-action


How to Build an Olympic Partnership That Actually Delivers

The sweet spot for signing an Olympic athlete is 12 to 18 months before the Games, when they are focused, motivated, and not yet overwhelmed with competing offers. For LA 2028, that window is open right now and starting to close for marquee names. Brands that sign athletes early get better rates, deeper integration opportunities, and more authentic storytelling. They also get something harder to quantify but genuinely valuable: the credibility of having shown up before the athlete was famous, not just after.

Consumers notice that distinction. Athletes notice it too, and the working relationships that result from early partnership tend to be significantly more collaborative and more productive than the ones signed in the final weeks before the Games when everyone is rushing. Building a roster rather than placing a single bet is equally important. One athlete gets injured. One has a bad performance. One says something off-script at exactly the wrong moment. Lindsey Vonn was airlifted off the mountain during Milano Cortina. If she had been a brand's only athlete, the entire campaign would have gone with her. Pairing a marquee name with two or three emerging athletes across different sports diversifies risk, broadens audience reach, and extends the content timeline significantly.

The old model of putting an athlete's face on a print ad is finished. What brands need is the ability to co-create content, repurpose organic social posts, and build integrated campaigns that live across multiple platforms simultaneously. The IOC's relaxed social media rules now mean athletes can post more freely during the Games than ever before, and athlete-generated content during the Olympics reaches audiences that traditional advertising cannot touch. Those rights need to be secured in the contract before negotiations close.

The stories that resonated most in recent Games cycles were not just about medals. They were about Elana Meyers Taylor signing to her deaf sons. Alysa Liu walking away from skating at 16 and coming back to win gold at 20. Breezy Johnson's medal literally breaking apart in her hands minutes after she won it. Consumers connect with narrative, not just achievement. The brands that build campaigns around the full human story get exponentially more value from the partnership. And for LA 2028, with the entertainment industry infrastructure of Los Angeles available to support athlete storytelling in ways no previous Games host city could match, the opportunity for that kind of narrative-driven brand partnership content is genuinely unprecedented.

Families and sports fans gathered at a public Olympic viewing event with national flags and brand signage, representing the fundamentally different audience demographics and engagement patterns that Olympic athlete partnerships deliver compared to standard influencer marketing campaigns.Photo Credit: iStock


LA 2028 Is the Biggest Brand Opportunity of the Decade. Are You Ready?

LA 2028 is not just another Olympic cycle. It is the intersection of the world's biggest sporting event and the entertainment capital of the planet, happening in a city where Hollywood Branded has been based and building relationships for over a decade. The marketing landscape for these Games is being rebuilt from the ground up. Venue naming rights are being permitted for the first time in Olympic history. The IOC has loosened athlete marketing restrictions in ways that unlock entirely new content opportunities. Integrated sponsorship packages now bundle rights across the Summer Olympics, the Paralympics, and Team USA into a single deal. The cultural and commercial scale of what is coming to Los Angeles in 2028 is genuinely hard to overstate, and the brands that move now will have the leverage, the relationships, and the creative runway to capitalize on it fully.

The brands that get Olympic partnerships right in 2028 will own one of the most significant cultural moments of the decade. The ones that wait too long, or that approach this environment the way they approach a standard influencer campaign, will spend the money without capturing the value. Olympic athlete partnerships require a different kind of investment, a different kind of planning, and a different kind of agency relationship than most brand marketing programs. The credibility is real. The emotional resonance is real. The window is open right now. The question is whether your brand will be part of the story or watching it from the sidelines.


Eager To Learn More?

If this piece got you thinking about how to position your brand for LA 2028 and build Olympic athlete partnerships that actually deliver, these related Hollywood Branded resources go deeper on the strategies and opportunities covered here:

Want to stay in the know with all things pop culture? Look no further than our Hot in Hollywood newsletter! Each week, we compile a list of the most talked-about moments in the entertainment industry, all for you to enjoy!

New call-to-action